5.1 years ago
cp1015
•
0
0
votes
3
replies
1.2k
views
0
votes
4
replies
854
views
updated 5.9 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 5.9 years ago by
gkuffel
▴
10
0
votes
1
reply
1.3k
views
updated 6.0 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 6.0 years ago by
sam.far.7
•
0
1
vote
11
replies
1.9k
views
updated 6.3 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 6.3 years ago by
Ashu
▴
10
2
votes
3
replies
1.7k
views
updated 6.4 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 6.4 years ago by
ap874
•
0
5
votes
10
replies
12k
views
updated 6.7 years ago by
Michael Love
42k
•
written 6.7 years ago by
pvd2107
▴
30
Recent ...
Replies
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
If you do it this way, the dispersion estimates would be much higher than they should (as the cell type difference is not accounted for in …
Comment: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
SamGG
▴
350
Simply remove the cell type from the model.
design <- model.matrix(~targets$Status)
Answer: ANOVA like approach of edgeR
by
Yunshun Chen
▴
870
You could try the followings:
> design <- model.matrix(~ 0 + group)
> contrast <- makeContrasts(PvsL = 0.5*(L.pregnant + B.pregnan…
Answer: Identical samples after deseq2 batch effect removal
by
maripane
•
0
Thanks Michael, so is there a way to work around this issue?
Can I somehow make sure I can remove this batch effects without overcorrecti…
Comment: CleanUpRNAseq with a GTF that is missing mitochondria annotation data
by
rcreed
•
0
The updated version worked well on my data. Thank you!
Votes
Awards
• All
Locations
• All
Germany, just now
The Netherlands, just now
United Kingdom, 1 minute ago
Ireland, 19 minutes ago
France, 29 minutes ago
Germany, just now
The Netherlands, just now
United Kingdom, 1 minute ago
Ireland, 19 minutes ago
France, 29 minutes ago
Traffic: 761 users visited in the last hour
Use of this site constitutes acceptance of our User Agreement and Privacy Policy.
Powered by the
version 2.3.6
version 2.3.6